NZ Skeptics
NZ Skeptics
  • Home
  • Join Us
  • Activities
    • Overview
    • Submissions
    • Homeopathy Campaign
    • Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • Resources
  • Awards
    • Bent Spoon
    • Bravo
    • Skeptic of the Year
    • Nominate
  • Media
    • Media Info
    • News
    • YouTube
    • Ken Ring
    • 1080 – What’s all the Fuss?
  • About
    • About Us
    • Committee
    • Society Status
    • Harassment
    • Constitution
    • Our History
  • Contact

All the Trouble in the World

May 1, 1995 Written by Carl Wyant

All the Trouble in the World, by P.J. O’Rourke; Pan Macmillan Australia Pty Ltd 1994; 340 pages; $20.00 paperback

Everyone will enjoy this book. Well, everyone except paranormalists, ecological alarmists, pseudo-scientists, feminists, left-wingers, the entire New Age community, and of course those eternally doom-ridden types who seem determined to drag everyone else down to their own level of self-imposed suffering.

My only complaint — and it is a grievous one — is that O’Rourke prefaces the book with the exact same H.L. Mencken quote that I was on the brink of using myself. (Call it a coincidence if you want, but the odds of such a thing happening strike me as so slim it’s hard to avoid thinking that some form of telepathy was at play.)

The quote in question appears in one of Mencken’s autobiographical books, Newspaper Days, written in 1941, wherein he refers to a formula he devised way back in the ’20s. He called it Mencken’s Law and it goes like this: “Whenever A annoys or injures B on the pretence of saving or improving X, A is a scoundrel.”

This was Mencken’s way of describing the same political correctness that plagues us today. The same old notion of virtue-on-the-cheap that has been annoying and injuring B since…Adam, probably. In Mencken’s time such nonsense led to Prohibition.

All the Trouble in the World opens with the line “This is a moment of hope in history. Why doesn’t anybody say so?”, which pretty much sums up what the book is about.

His general thesis here is that we are living in great and exciting times, and that humanity is better off now than it has ever been. But thanks to ecological despair mongers, whinging leftists, and the apocalyptic messages of the New Agers and Born Again Armageddonites, who believe that the only road to salvation is to abandon all rational thought and embrace the teachings of the fairy dust queen, we have been bamboozled into thinking that the monsters of ruin and disaster are breathing down our very necks.

The book is subtitled “the lighter side of famine, pestilence, destruction and death”, and to look at the whys and wherefores of all this O’Rourke takes us on a hilarious romp to countries where such things are taking place, including Somalia, former Yugoslavia, Haiti and the Amazon, resulting in a travelogue guaranteed to send the painfully virtuous on a book-burning spree.

Like all of O’Rourke’s writing, the style is garrulous, comical and fun to read; the content well informed and the reporting first-rate. Unfortunately, there is no outright O’Rourkian madness such as we find in Republican Party Reptile — “How to Drive Drunk While Getting Your Wing Wang Squeezed Without Spilling Your Drink”, for instance — but such failings aside, I would not hesitate to put All the Trouble in the World on any skeptic’s reading list.

35, Books, Reviews
book, thinking
Demons, Drought and Bullfeathers
Some UFO Experiences

Twitter

My Tweets

Skeptic Alert

Sign up for our low-volume, high-interest Skeptic email alerts

{captcha}

Donations

If you would like to support the NZ Skeptics beyond your membership payment, please consider donating to us. Every dollar helps.

Facebook

Darryl Nightingale

4 hours ago

Darryl Nightingale

The blasphemy law in New Zealand is an interesting one, for it does not prohibit criticism of religions or religious beliefs and practices.

In New Zealand it is an offence under section 123 of the Crimes Act 1961 to publish any blasphemous libel.

But sub-section 123(3) of the provides:

It is not an offence against this section to express in good faith and in decent language, or to attempt to establish by arguments used in good faith and conveyed in decent language, any opinion whatever on any religious subject.

That is, there is in the blasphemy law a distinction between criticism and language which provokes outrage by insulting insulting, ridiculing or vilifying religion or religious beliefs and practices. The former is fine, the latter is not.

Similarly, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 gives everyone the right to freedom of expression, including the right to seek, receive and impart information and opinions of any kind in any form.

But hate speech is prohibited under section 61 of the Human Rights Act 1993.

Section 61 of the Act makes it unlawful "threatening, abusive, or insulting...matter or words likely to excite hostility against or bring into contempt any group of persons..."

Hate speech is speech attacks persons or groups on the basis of attributes such as race, religion, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, disability, or gender.

Some argue that anybody should have the right to say anything they like.

But hate speech is banned on the grounds that it can harm people psychologically, have a negative impact on social cohesiveness, and incite persecution and violence.

It is, of course, questionable whether a valid distinction can be drawn between the harm caused by the vilification of persons and the harm caused by the vilification of a person’s fundamentally held beliefs.

But I would argue that the Human Rights Act effectively makes the much more narrowly focused blasphemy law redundant.

.

We have a legal obligation to refrain in public from insulting and abusive language.

But do we also have a moral duty to stand against it - and report it - when we see it?
... See MoreSee Less

Photo

View on Facebook
·Share

Darryl Nightingale

2 hours ago

Darryl Nightingale

Secular Rescue is an underground railroad of sorts for non-believers in countries where simply expressing doubt about religious belief is a criminal offense or where it may lead to grave physical harm.

Although some organizations like Amnesty International have taken up the cause of certain individuals, Secular Rescue was founded to tackle the broader global problem.

The support it offers is largely diplomatic, financial, and legal: to pull strings with government agencies, organize the transportation of potential victims, and pay the costs of settling in a new country.

Since 2015, it has helped save 30 people.

With enough funds, the group would hope to help many more.

Beyond creating these escape routes, Secular Rescue also campaigns for bodies like the UN to protect the rights of atheists to express their freedom of conscience.

Secular Rescue was launched in 2013 by the Center for Inquiry, a US-based non-profit which seeks to foster a secular society based on reason, science, freedom of inquiry, and humanist values.

Center for Inquiry Launches “Secular Rescue” to Save Lives of Threatened Activists
www.centerforinquiry.net/newsroom/center_for_inquiry_launches_secular_rescue_to_save_lives_of_thr...

Center for Inquiry
www.centerforinquiry.net/
.
... See MoreSee Less

Photo

View on Facebook
·Share

Kris De Jong

1 day ago

Kris De Jong

Apparently God is now directly intervening in America's justice system. Maybe he could hand down verdicts for everyone, which would save a lot of time and money.

... See MoreSee Less

Texas judge says God told him defendant is not guilty

nzherald.co.nz

'When God tells me I gotta do something, I gotta do it,' he said.

View on Facebook
·Share

Copyright © 2015 - 2017 NZ Skeptics. . All rights reserved.
Contact us at [email protected] or PO Box 747, Pipitea, Wellington 6011